Blog-Layout

MASS SURVEILLANCE

Orwellian Dystopia of the East

Human rights experts criticize China for its extensive mass surveillance program that increasingly targets Muslim minorities.

By Srishti Nair

October 10, 2020

“Nobody can move because they watch you through the video cameras, and after a while a voice came from the speakers telling you that now you can relax for a few minutes. That voice also tells you off for moving…we were watched, even in the toilet. In political education camp, we were always under stress.”


Rustam, a former detainee who spent months in political education camps, May 2018




Cameras loaded with facial recognition technology to track movements, extensive grid-like security network, street corners manned by armed police booths, AI based monitoring in schools; The Chinese government has resorted to targeting its own minority population by way of a far reaching web of high-tech mass surveillance systems utilizing QR codes, artificial intelligence, biometrics,  big data etc.


In the Muslim dominated Xinjiang, alongside cameras the government has installed “data doors”, a machine that collects personal information off of electronic gadgets that people passing through it are in possession of. Knives engraved with machine-readable QR codes are posted on front doors which are scanned by officials to link people to their homes and belongings. The authorities also collect biometric data such as DNA, iris scans etc. and store them in accessible databases.


In addition, as reported by Human Rights Watch , the Integrated Joint Operations Platform (IJOP) is used to collect and monitor information ranging from personal information like blood type to miscellaneous information such as whether an individual has got a new number, made any donations to a mosque, made contact with any non-chinese number etc. Based on such dubious information, the program flags individuals who could be potentially threatening to the peace and security of the country.These individuals are then further investigated, or sent for detention and re-education. In order to add more survey-based data to the deep-learning system of IJOP, several face to face assessments have also been conducted by police officials. Following which they made use of parameters such as whether or not the person was Uighur, whether they prayed regularly, whether they taught Islamic culture to their children at home etc. to mark them as “safe”, “average”, or “unsafe”. In this manner, the officials concluded as to who is a potential threat and fitted for transformation through “education camps”.


Not only this, a high definition portfolio of face signatures has also been developed by the authorities by scanning people from different angles and with different facial expressions. Alongside this Uighur individuals have also been compelled to download nanny apps which keep a check on everything that they see, read, write and talk about  using their smartphones. In several cases, even years of WeChat history has been used as evidence of the prerequisite for Uighur individuals to be sent to the detention camps.


In these camps, which are often referred to as
vocational training centres by the Chinese authorities, Muslim minorities, are being forcefully detained wherein they are stripped off of  their social, cultural and religious identity. Further, they are exploited as cheap labour to produce beauty products and exposed are to brutal torture, sexual violence, mass sterilization, abortions etc.



International response


UN and its officials have demanded official access to these camps. Even the United States of America has imposed sanctions on Chinese officials involved in persecuting the Uighurs and also passed a law requiring U.S. businesses and individuals operating or selling products in Xinjiang to ensure that their activities don’t contribute to human rights violation.


Several human rights activists and organisations including the Human Rights Watch have also called for other actions such as denying exports of technologies that facilitate abuse; insisting on allowing UN investigators in Xinjiang; and preventing China from targeting members of the Uighur diaspora etc. As contended by  the Financial times , the time has come that countries across the globe participate in a realistic engagement to challenge this dystopia.


Srishti Nair is pursuing her undergraduate degree in law from Symbiosis International ( Deemed ) University. She is interested towards exploring the intersectionality between law and technology and the protection of human rights.

Read More

By Kamayani 21 Sep, 2022
Elon Musk points at Twitter's cybersecurity vulnerabilities to cancel $44 bn buyout-deal.
By Raushan Tara Jaswal 21 Sep, 2022
Time is running out on the National Security defence adopted by the Government of India for the prolonged ban on Chinese based Mobile Applications.
By Marco Schmidt 21 Sep, 2022
This article is a follow-up to “Showdown Down Under?” which was published here last year. As our cycle aims to explore jurisdictions outside the EU and North America, we will further dive into Australian competition law by outlining its basic structure, introducing the relevant actors and give an insight into the pursued policies in the realm of digital markets with a particular focus on “ad tech”.
By Linda Jaeck 16 Jan, 2022
How AI is enabling new frontiers in Mars exploration.
By Marco Schmidt 09 Aug, 2021
Regulation is gaining more traction all over the place but it is uncertain if the Australian News Media Bargain Code will become a role model for legislation in other places. There are several weaknesses to the Code and after all, it is not clear if paying publishers for their content will really alter the high levels of market concentration.
By Theint Theint Thu 09 Aug, 2021
The perseverance of Myanmar’s youth to fight for freedom is proving to be the key to the country’s democratic future.

Watch Our Episodes

Share by: